Search past question, project, seminar or forum topic:


Project topic for Law department.



1.1 Background to the study

The Constitution of Nigeria 1999 (as amended) clearly ensures the separation of powers as an underlining principle of the Nigerian governmental system. Separation of powers allows typical division of branches of government into a legislature, an executive, and a judiciary. It can be contrasted with the fusion or combination of powers like in the case of a parliamentary system, where the executive and legislature sometimes parts of the judiciary are unified, for the purpose of governance. Separation of powers as underlining principle of governance vests legislative power of the Federal Government in the National Assembly. It provides thus: The legislative power of the Federal Republic of Nigeria shall be vested in a National Assembly for the Federation which shall consist of a Senate and a House of Representative. [1]

The National Assembly of the Federal Republic of Nigeria is a bicameral legislature established under section 4 of the Nigerian Constitution. It consists of a Senate and a House of Representatives. The body, modeled after the Federal Congress of the United States of America, is supposed to guarantee equal representation of the states irrespective of size in the Senate and proportional representation of population in the House. The National Assembly, like many other organs of government, has functions such as law making, checking  of other organs of government, especially the executive, representation etc. the mechanism in which the legislature uses in sanctioning the executive when there is any misconduct is the impeachment process.

The Impeachment process has become a topical issue on the Constitutional development of Nigeria. The starting point was the impeachment of AlhajiBalarabe Musa former Governor of Kaduna State. [2] It has been contended that impeachment has been so much abused by the State Assemblies who do it without recourse to laid down Constitutional measures. [3]       

No proceeding or determination of the panel or of the House of Assembly or any matter relating to such proceedings or determination shall be entertained or questioned in any Court. This provision ousted the jurisdiction of the Court in matter relating to impeachment embarked upon by the Legislature.

Impeachment rarely occurs therefore the term is often misunderstood. [4] The word impeachment derives its root from a latin expression to be caught or entrapped. Thus impeachment as a Constitutional process is not designed as a weapon of political oppression, suppression or harassment of a President or Governor whose face the Legislature does not want to behold any longer in the power.

 However, impeachment when used appropriately will put the government of the day on its toes, thereby making such government responsible and accountable.

Impeachment was first employed in the Nigerian history during the second republic in the case of Balarabe Musa, former Governor of Kaduna State. Since then impeachment process has become a topical issue in Nigeria’s Constitutional development.

1.2 Statement Of The Problem

In Nigeria Constitutional history, there have been four Constitutions. These are the 1960, 1963, 1979 and the 1999 Constitution respectively. Although there existed and still existing provisions from the removal of executive office holders like the President. This power vested on the legislature, which is sacred, aimed at checking abuse of office by President, Vice president, Governors and Deputy Governors, was unfortunately turned to an instrument of political vendetta to embarrass, intimidate, and hoodwink the executive (Enyia,2009). This impeachment saga in Nigeria is replete only with the removal of Governors of the Federating States and some Chairmen at the Local Government level in some States.

The process of impeachment of different political office holders is clearly stated in different sections of the Constitution depending on the nature of office. Hence, breach of procedures is usually one of the major challenges confronting the role of the legislature in this process.   The discretion in using this tool of impeachment is very much that the legislature which in this case are the National or State Assembly. This exercise of this discretion is implicit in the wording of Section 188 (2) (b) which provides: “that the holder of such office is guilty of gross misconduct in the performance of the functions of his office”. The term ‘gross misconduct’ is defined in Section 188 (11) as, “a grave violation or breach of the provisions of this Constitution or a misconduct of such nature as amounts in the opinion of the House of Assembly to gross misconduct”. This in itself is a very subjective test and in the absence of further definition in the constitution reliance is placed on the general dictionary definition of the term and what obtains in Employment law where the term is commonly used in contracts of employment. Gross misconduct can be defined as an unacceptable and wrong act by someone in a position of authority and responsibility. Reliance is once again placed on the three principles established in the U.S.A that gross misconduct can be established. It is respectfully submitted that without these three ingredients, the Impeachment proceedings cannot be effective. Corruption in its sense is a major challenging factor to the legislatures in delivering in this responsibility due to personal interest.

1.3 Aims and Objectives Of The Study

The main aims and objectives of this study is to determine the role of the Legislature in impeachment proceedings under the 1999 Constitution. The role of the legislature in impeachment proceedings and the loopholes in such proceedings will be considered and recommendations will be made to curb the problems created by these loopholes. This research work will examine the problems arising from the Constitutional provisions dealing with impeachment of elected Officials in Nigeria.

1.4 Research Methodology

The research work will employ a library based methodology as emphases will be laid on primary sources to include; relevant statutes, legislations, Reported Judicial Authorities etc. The Secondary data will be obtained from materials such as  Newspapers, articles by Legal authors, Internet resources, seminar papers and Textbooks. These will no doubt give a holistic approach to achieving the objectives of the study.

1.5 Significance of the Study

The findings of this study when concluded will be useful to the following categories of people:

  • Executive arm of government: The President, Vice-President, Governors and         their Deputies will be conscious of the need to avoid committing misconduct        in order to avoid being impeached.
  • State and National Assembly: As members of the law making bodies, it will           help them to realize the responsibility they are saddled with and the need for            being committed to national service.

1.6 Scope of the Study

This research work is limited to the role the legislature performs during impeachment proceedings. This research work would be confined to the definition of impeachment, historical perspective, the roles of the three arms of Government on impeachment matters. The Constitutional provision and role of Courts of record, i.e. High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court on impeachment matters and cases will be delved into in order to compare and analyze the decision of the Courts.

Nevertheless, it may incidentally refer to some other related areas as deemednecessary, likewise statutory and judicial authorities will be made reference to, in order to achieve the aim of the study.

For complete material - Click Here

Other topics you might be interested in: